Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Three zip codes, eight-year price look-back


By Don Dunning | November 25, 2013

Originally appeared in Bay Area News Group publications on November 1, 2013

If you don’t know history, then you don’t know anything. You are a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree.
– Michael Crichton

2013 has been an excellent year for sellers because low interest rates and insufficient inventory have led to high prices. Buyers, conversely, have found this to be a challenging real estate market.

I hear many opinions about local prices. With so much information online, it is easy to draw conclusions, but are they correct? Some say prices have surpassed highs of our previous seller’s market, others think not.

To answer this question, I chose three popular Oakland zip codes, 94602, 94611 and 94618, and charted Multiple Listing Service (MLS) statistics back to 2005, the peak year for closed sales.

Which stats were used?

For each zip, I reviewed number of solds, sales price (average) and days on market (average). Data for 2013 are through October 25th.

94602

This zip includes Glenview, Dimond and Oakmore. Closed sales crested at 315 in 2006 (308 in 2005). In comparison, 2013 to date is 258, so the totals will probably be close. 2009 was the nadir at 206. Days on market are 20 this year, the lowest in this span. The highest were 40 in 2011 and 39 in 2008. Sales prices were tops in 2005 and 2006 at just above $655,000 and lowest in 2011 at $448,000. Prices in 2012 were $489,000 and rose to almost $641,000 this year. Clearly, timing can be the difference between making or losing a large sum of money.

94611

Montclair and the Piedmont Avenue area are in this zip. Closed sales spiked to 365 in 2005 and dropped to a low of 209 in 2009. Days on market ranged from 18 in 2005 to 47 in 2011.

$963,000 was the pinnacle for prices in 2007 (2006 was close) and they sank to $675,000 in 2011. 2013 prices to date are almost $859,000, $129,000 more than 2012.

94618

This is one of the most sought-after and priciest zips because it is Rockridge. At 142 to date, we are on track this year to approach the 165 solds in 2007. 2009 saw the low of 115. The 18 days on market average of 2013 is half the tally for last year and two below the 20 of 2005.

With a current average sales price of $1,029,000, Rockridge, although on their wish list, is out of range for many buyers. Today’s prices, however, are $87,000 lower than they were in 2007, but $138,000 higher than 2011. Changes like this are difficult even for experts to predict.

Digesting the data

Contrary to what it may feel like, the average sales price for none of the three zips cited above is now higher than its previous peak.

Prices tend to continue rising, sometimes for a number of years, after the market has reached its apex. This becomes clear only when looking back. In all three zips, as has been true in previous seller’s markets, prices kept climbing in years after the 2005 peak.

Figures can vary from zip to zip and neighborhood to neighborhood. Do not assume; get accurate facts. Generalized statistics may not be totally applicable to a specific home, but it cannot hurt to have an overview.

Folks who buy at the top are most in danger of losing money when they sell. There were a plethora of cases in the last seller’s market where buyers paid more than was warranted. This was a major factor, as was too-easy-to-get loans, in the avalanche of distressed properties beginning in 2008.

Each zip has more and less desirable streets and sections which significantly influence prices. It is useful for buyers and sellers to know the average, median, highest and lowest selling prices for their location. Overpricing for a seller can sometimes be as harmful as overpaying for a buyer.

As real estate is a “sales” business, there are licensees who emphasize making the sale rather than educating and protecting their clients. Once the music stops, it is buyers who overpaid that have a big problem, although this may not be apparent for years.

Protect yourself

As a buyer or seller, do not make the mistake of thinking you can learn enough on your own by going online. Aside from inaccurate information, which is rampant, Internet sites and even the MLS are often not adequate to keep you out of trouble.

In 2013, some buyers have paid the highest prices ever for a particular neighborhood or part of it. From an investment standpoint, this is very risky. When, not if, the market changes those homes might sell for substantially less. It is likely that these buyers did not ask their agent the top price previously paid for a comparable home in that area.

Sellers need to request their agent to provide this kind of historical perspective in addition to more recent sales. This is an important aspect of pricing.

Similar to what has happened in Brooklyn vis-a-vis Manhattan, Oakland real estate has been benefitting from San Francisco’s unaffordability. For years, many buyers who were priced out of the City have bought in Oakland. They can afford prices that are high here, but unworkable there.

Caution: Do not allow others with much greater financial resources to push you pay a price you may regret in the future. If the numbers do not make sense, keep looking. It may take longer, but you will be glad you did.

Final thoughts

Buying or selling an East Bay home involves too much money for guesswork. Do your homework and avoid expensive mistakes.

Related Articles:

Today’s Seller’s Market is Creating Future Victims: An Insider’s Look at Multiple Offers
Seller’s Market for How Long?

 

 

Copyright 2013 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Tags: Buying, Buying a home, East Bay, market statistics, Newspaper article, Selling a Home, The Economy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org