Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Today’s seller’s market is creating future victims: An Insider’s Look at Multiple Offers


By Don Dunning | April 5, 2013

Originally appeared in Bay Area News Group publications on April 5, 2013

“Common sense is the most fairly distributed thing in the world, for each one thinks he is so well-endowed with it that even those who are hardest to satisfy in all other matters are not in the habit of desiring more of it than they already have.”
– Rene Descartes

It is no secret that a shortage of inventory, combined with historically low interest rates, has led to a market where, in certain areas and price ranges, multiple offers are the norm. Recently, I wrote about the dangers of contracts without contingencies.

There are few areas of real estate where buyers need outstanding representation more than in the handling of multiple offers. Sadly, some buyers are working with licensees who lack the knowledge, caring, or both to protect them from paying more than necessary.

Analyzing asking price

Before deciding how much to offer, ask your agent’s opinion of the asking price. Is it high, low, or just right? This should be based on recent closed sales (three months back at most) for properties in the same or comparable neighborhoods. When a home is priced at the top of the market, it may make little sense to offer more; if it is attractively priced, a higher bid can be made and still be reasonable.

Condition

Carefully consider potential problems: A large structural pest control report, foundation defects, drainage issues, the need for a new roof, sewer lateral replacement. In addition, dated kitchens and baths are expensive to upgrade and should be included in the equation. Further, depending on size, interior and exterior painting by a professional can cost well over $10,000.

Take the price you plan to offer and add a ballpark figure for the items above. Compare the total to the highest sold prices in that neighborhood for a completely remodeled home of approximately the same size. Offering less than the highest sold figure is, normally, appropriate.

It is possible that prices will continue to spike for a number of years and your superior offer today will look good at a later time; however, I would not count on that.

Many folks who paid what was then a high price in 2003 through 2005 might have been able to sell for more in 2006 and early 2007. Nevertheless, those who did not sell may, today, have negative equity.

Number of other offers

Potentially, the more offers, the higher the price. As the number of bids increase to 15, 20 or more, it is a question of how high the buyer who really wants it is willing to go. Keep in mind that the amount to get an accepted offer is a different question from how much the house is really worth. Buyers frequently forget the second part in the heat of the moment and their agent may not point this out.

Although there is no formula per se, experienced agents know what has a chance to work or not based on the number of offers, but there is a problem. Few contracts today are presented in person to the seller and his agent. Almost all are emailed. This makes it much trickier to know how many offers actually are involved.

Finding out this number is where agents might be letting their buyers down. Some salespeople submit an offer that is supposed to be based on a certain number of bids without knowing the true figure.

Mechanics of presenting offer

Most buyers do not know they can request their agent to act under specific, written, signed instructions regarding their offer. For example, “If there are no other offers, my offer will be asking price; If there are one or two other offers, my offer will be …” and so on. Given the amount of money at stake, this protection is prudent.

These instructions should include a statement that your agent make arrangements, in advance, to contact the listing agent right before the deadline to submit offers and determine the actual number of contracts that came in up to that point and/or are still expected.

To be most cautious, your written instructions can state that you do not want your offer sent in unless your agent has contacted the listing agent and found out how many other contracts there were. These safeguards are unlikely to work if the property is a short sale or REO.

The fear factor

Be wary of an agent who says, “It may be a high price, but it probably will be higher next month,” rather than, “This high price is something you may regret in the future.” Fear is a tactic used by some licensees and you may not realize it until it is too late. It is better to have an agent who talks you out of paying too much.

What buyers do not know is that the best listing agents will often give the top two or three offers an opportunity to adjust. Usually this means increasing the price. Competent selling (buyer’s) agents ask the listing agent how he/she will be handling these situations.

I have seen many times where a buyer, who probably was not advised otherwise by his agent, paid tens of thousands more than necessary. And the buyer never knew. This is where agent feedback is so important, but is commonly lacking. Make sure it does not happen to you.

Final thoughts

I often advise my buyers to “take a pass” when the activity on a particular listing gets out of hand. It is far better to keep looking than to pay more than is dictated by common sense.

Related Articles:

Contingency-free Contracts Can Be Dangerous

 

 

Copyright 2013 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Tags: Buying a home, multiple offers, Newspaper article, Real Estate Advice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org