Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Multiple Offers, Part 2


By Don Dunning | June 19, 1998

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, June 19, 1998

Today, we are in a classic seller’s market: too many buyers chasing too few properties. As a seller, how do you react if you are lucky enough to receive a number of offers? As a buyer, what should you know about possible seller strategies before you find yourself in a multiple offer situation?

Multiple counters

Some sellers, prompted by their agent, write simultaneous counteroffers to a number of bids. It is called a multiple counteroffer. Each document includes a statement that other buyers are also getting a counteroffer, which may or may not be exactly the same.

I have always counseled against using multiple counteroffers, although the California Association of Realtors (CAR) has legitimized this questionable practice. CAR includes it as an option on its counteroffer form.

Even if the buyer accepts and signs the counteroffer with no changes, the seller is still not obligated to sell to him. The CAR form states, “Acceptance of this counteroffer by buyer shall not be binding unless and until it is subsequently re-signed by seller…below.” The listing agent waits to see which counters come back and then the seller chooses among them.

Multiple counteroffers antagonize most buyers and their agents. First the buyers may have been held back from presenting their offers until the appointed day; now they have to go through another round of waiting and worrying. I know of a number of buyers who were extremely upset at both the seller and his agent for putting them through this.

Even the buyer with the accepted contract can be seriously turned off by the procedure. He could be left with a feeling of distrust as to how the seller intends to handle the rest of the transaction. Although he reluctantly accepts the contract, he might later use inspections to renegotiate the price. Or, worse, as revenge, he may look to use lack of disclosure or other issues to create legal problems after close of escrow.

Countering over asking price

Some sellers who issue multiple counteroffers counter the price higher, even when the initial offer was greater than the asking price. Sellers rationalize why this is acceptable; buyers react with disdain.

I recently heard a story of erroneous seller thinking. A home had been on the market almost two weeks with no offers. At that point, an offer was written very close to the asking price. The seller countered at well over list price.

The seller believed that, in this market, his house was worth more than the asking price. The buyer’s reasonable question was, “If it hasn’t sold at a lower price, how can it be worth more?” That property is still on the market.

Evaluating competing offers

One of the reasons for multiple counteroffers is that the seller cannot (or will not) decide which contract to accept. Every offer has its strengths and weaknesses. To help in the decision process, here are some key factors to rank each offer:

  • Purchase price
  • Financial strength and credit of the buyer (lender pre-approval letter is a must)
  • Cash down (more makes buyer stronger; all cash, no loan, is strongest)
  • Deposit in escrow (higher deposit equals stronger buyer commitment)
  • Flexibility on terms (close of escrow; possession)
  • Contingencies (inspections; financing; selling another property)
  • Handling of pest control, roof or structural problems
  • Is this house special to the buyer?
  • Seller’s impression of the buyer’s agent In the end, even if close, one offer/buyer will stand out from the others.

Once the choice is made, the preferred offer is either accepted or countered in primary position. Other contracts may be accepted or countered in backup position (first backup, second backup, etc.). All of the respected professionals I know use this approach.

The cardinal mistake

It may sound illogical, but it happens: selling a home to two different buyers. This is at the top of the taboo list. Inexperienced agents may not realize how easily it can happen, especially in a revved up market.

One cause is improperly worded counteroffers. In such a case, two or more counters may come back signed by buyers, each thinking he has bought your home. This can be avoided by careful use of specific verbiage, especially if you are doing multiple counteroffers and not using standardized forms. Another dangerous situation may occur if you improperly notify a backup buyer he is now primary before the first contract has been voided. For example, let’s suppose you received a higher offer from a second buyer after you had ratified a contract. Legally, you could accept the second bid in backup position, subject to the failure of the primary offer.

Let’s further hypothesize that the first buyer was one day late in removing his inspection contingency in writing. Seizing this apparent opportunity, you instruct your agent to tell the primary buyer you consider his contract dead and the backup buyer receives a fax that he is now primary. After all, as a seller, isn’t this your right?

Perhaps not. What if the reason for the buyer’s delayed inspection contingency removal was a potentially serious problem discovered during inspections? As a further complication, it was something you had not disclosed. The buyer’s position would be he has the right to have the problem looked into and it is material to his buying the house. In such a situation, the first buyer could not be capriciously displaced.

A competent Realtor would point this out to his seller before taking any action. Regardless, once you are in contract, you need a written rescission from the first buyer before you can safely move another contract into primary position.

Time for inspections

In competition, and to strengthen their offer, many buyers will either not ask for an inspection contingency or will make it very short, e.g., three days. Even if this happens, you, as a seller, should consider giving the buyer adequate time to fully inspect your property. Less than five working days after acceptance is insufficient because the best inspectors and tradespeople are difficult to schedule on short notice. Allowing enough time for thorough inspections will minimize the likelihood of the buyer using this later as a basis for a claim against you.

Final Thoughts

Not all properties will receive multiple offers. Some that might have, however, may not have been given sufficient marketing. To maximize the opportunity for offers, make sure your house receives full exposure before accepting a contract.

If you are fortunate enough to get more than one offer, take specific steps to ensure the process is fair to buyers and yourself.

Related Articles:

Multiple Offers, Part 1
 
 

Copyright 1998 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org