Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Multiple Offers, Part 1


By Don Dunning | June 12, 1998

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, June 12, 1998

Competitive offers are common in this sizzling seller’s market. How to deal with them fairly is often misunderstood by the public and real estate agents alike. A poorly handled multiple offer situation can lead to a buyer failing to get the home he wants. It may also cost a seller thousands of dollars in unrealized sales price.

Listings agents are in control

Few sellers have sufficient previous experience responding to multiple offers. This is why the seller’s (listing) agent almost always directs how and when offers will be presented.

Prior to signing a listing, a seller should interview a number of Realtors and inquire about their background. Ask if they were in the business in this area during the last seller’s market of the late1980s; how many times they have represented a seller who had multiple offers; what upsets occurred on the part of buyers or agents who were unsuccessful in their bids; what pricing strategy would they recommend; and how they would schedule the presentation date.

When to hear offers

In this frenetic market, it often makes sense for a seller with a desirable home to pre-set a date for hearing offers. It is only in this kind of market that a buyer may be forced to wait to present an offer.

The date a seller chooses should be one that gives buyers and their agents sufficient time to see the home and write a contract. This may seem like an obvious statement; however, there have been a number of new listings this year that had a Sunday open house (the first time buyers and agents could view the property), a broker’s tour on Monday, and offers scheduled for Wednesday. In effect, the property was exposed to the market for only three days. Such a short window is insufficient. It defeats the seller’s purpose of eliciting the best offer possible.

Pick a presentation date between five and seven days after the house comes on the market. Some sellers hold off for up to ten days, but too long a wait can turn someone who is excited about buying your home into one who buys another.

More or fewer offers than expected

When the appointed day and time for presenting offers finally arrives, it is not unusual for the number of actual offers to be different than anticipated.

As the days to presentation count down, buyers have their agents call the listing agent to ask how many offers have been written. Since many buyers are holding back from admitting they are writing an offer, the listing agent cannot be sure. This leaves the inquiring agent without a vital bit of information to help plan his buyer’s strategy.

In one scenario, a buyer’s agent arrives for presentation thinking his is the only offer. At the last minute, another bid materializes. Because there is now competition, the first buyer must be given the opportunity to improve his offer, if he so chooses, before the seller makes a final decision. Not to do so would be unfair to both the buyer and seller.

Another situation would be where a buyer wrote a contract with prior knowledge that there was at least one other bid. Before presentation, the other buyer or buyers drop out. The listing agent is obligated to disclose this. As the buyer was operating in the context of competition, it is possible he may withdraw completely if not given the opportunity to adjust his offer accordingly.

Finally, there is the case where two or more offers have been written and other, expected bids did not materialize. These contracts were written with the idea they were in competition with many other offers, not just a few. Again, an agent’s approach may change given the new circumstances.

It is the unexpected that can cause acrimony in multiple offer transactions. This is where an agent’s experience and common sense are vital.

How to set up the multiple presentation

By the day of presentation, the listing agent will have heard from agents who have written offers. He will usually schedule them twenty to thirty minutes apart. Each buyer’s agent presents his offer to the seller and listing agent privately. The order of presentation is not significant. An unsatisfactory offer will not be improved by when it was presented, nor will a strong one be weakened.

A number of buyers have told me they would prefer to personally sit around a table with all other competing buyers and explain why the seller should accept their offer. This is not done for the same reasons agents with competing contracts do not present their offers in front of each other. Each offer deserves undivided attention. Any other way is inappropriate and unprofessional.

Final Thoughts

Buyers and sellers are entitled to have multiple offers handled in an above-board and professional manner. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Compounding the problem, some sellers allow their agent to make multiple counteroffers. This and other issues will be discussed in part two.

Related Articles:

Multiple Offers, Part 2
Hot Market Gambits
Emotional Ping-Pong

 

 

Copyright 1998 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org