Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Determining the Strongest Offer


By Don Dunning | February 24, 2001

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, Feb. 23, 2001 and ANG Newspapers, Feb. 24, 2001

Despite serious economic warning signals, our local real estate market is maintaining a torrid pace for the fifth consecutive year. I know of two properties that recently received 34 and 32 offers, respectively. This past week, one of my listings engendered 16 bids; another attracted 15.

In multiple offer situations, most buyers recognize that the asking price is simply the starting point. As a higher than list price is generally given in competition, a seller must take other factors into consideration before ratifying a contract. Understanding what constitutes a strong offer is important to buyers, before writing, and sellers, before accepting, a purchase contract.

Can the buyer perform?

The crucial question, above all others, is whether the buyer will actually perform, i.e., close the escrow on the written terms and conditions. This is always a best guess, based upon experience. As a seller, you must rely on your Realtor’s professionalism, knowledge and longevity in the business. Hopefully, you thought about this before hiring your agent.

Not long ago, a seller received an offer with a cover note from a licensee guaranteeing that his was an excellent buyer who would close escrow in 30 days or less. The listing agent asked if the buyer’s cash was “liquid and available now.” He was assured it was.

The seller’s agent took the additional step of calling the mortgage broker who had provided the pre-approval letter. He then discovered that the buyer’s funds would not be available in time for the close of escrow. This was a case where the buyer could not carry out the contract as originally written.

In the end, the principals were able to work it out. Nevertheless, if that call to the lender had not been made, the close would have been delayed, resulting in an unhappy seller.

Although the highest price sounds best, an offer that does not close is worthless. Even all cash sales are not necessarily the “slam-dunk” they appear to be. The best listing agents protect their sellers by insisting on substantiation of all the funds necessary to close the escrow before the seller accepts.

Terms and other issues

It is not always easy to dovetail the needs of the buyer and seller; each has to coordinate moving elsewhere. In competition, allowing the seller flexibility in relinquishing possession of the property is counted as a plus for the buyer. This could involve a combination of a longer close of escrow and seller rent back, some, or all, of which may be at no cost to the seller.

Another concern is how the buyer will handle inspections. In a bidding war, some buyers waive all contingencies. This means they are not asking for any time to approve inspections or financing. It is a risky approach and should be done, if at all, only by buyers who have the cash to close without a loan and who have had the property thoroughly inspected before writing the contract.

Many sellers and their agents will not allow pre-sale inspections. Even if they do, at $500 or more a pop, it can get quite expensive to do inspections and then have an offer rejected.

Related to inspections is the question of whether the buyer is asking for work to be done by the seller, or is buying “As Is.” Naturally, sellers prefer As Is; buyers, however, must be careful to know a property’s problems before agreeing to this arrangement.

A lender’s pre-approval letter, stating that the buyer has been checked and approved is sine qua non when there are multiple bids. In addition, the type of loan and amount of down payment are significant items.

Although zero down loans and a variety of programs are available, a conventional loan with at least 20% down and a short contingency (14 to 21 days) is viewed as stronger in competition. This makes it difficult for buyers who have good incomes, but do not have hordes of cash.

The initial deposit could also play a role. For example, on a home listed for $525,000, there might be two offers of $600,000, with 20% down. If the deposit on one was $5000, and the other was $25,000, the larger one could be a positive. The seller and his agent would likely see the higher deposit as greater motivation. At the least, it would show the buyer has the money and is willing to put it into escrow now.

Everything else being equal, a buyer who plans to live in the home will generally have the advantage over one who is buying it as an investment.

As a buyer, who your agent is, and how he presents your offer, may be crucial. Professionals prefer to work with other professionals. Choosing a local Realtor who is known and respected in the real estate community can often make a difference.

Final Thoughts

In multiple offer scenarios, there are many times when a seller will have difficulty choosing between similar offers. Most sellers need guidance from a competent real estate professional to ferret out the most advantageous one.

Buyers will have a greater chance of success by looking at the process from a Realtor’s perspective. In the popular neighborhoods and price ranges, until the market changes, only highly qualified buyers who are willing to structure extremely attractive offers will prevail.

Related Articles:

Multiple Offers, Part 1
Multiple Offers, Part 2
Confirm Competing Offers

 

 

Copyright 2001 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org