Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Prices Up, Market Shifting


By Don Dunning | May 11, 2001

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, May 11, 2001

The boom market that began at the start of 1997 is now in transition. Although prices in our area and the inventory of available homes continue to rise, the percentage of homes sold is dropping. As time goes on, this could make purchasing significantly easier for buyers. Right now, however, we are at the beginning of a change that is not totally predictable.

If you accept that the market is wavering, and react accordingly, you will make better decisions. Conversely, denying that conditions are in flux could lead to costly mistakes.

A new way of thinking

Our local residential real estate market is in the midst of a paradigm shift. The model for how to behave is now different; there are buyers, sellers and agents who lack the experience to respond appropriately.

For almost four-and-a-half years, we have become accustomed to multiple offers on almost all properties, leading to ever-higher prices. Sellers had all the leverage; buyers had none. The tricky part is that, in some cases, this still is true.

Responding suitably means applying basic real estate principles, especially in these uncertain times. Keep in mind the key determinants of value: location; condition; style; floor plan; quality of construction; schools; outside living; privacy; quiet vs. noise; how many steps; light vs. dark; neighboring properties; and convenience to shops and transportation.

Caveats for buyers and sellers

Multiple offers remain common, although a home that might have received 15 to 20 offers at this time last year, may now be receiving five. The upper end of the market is softening, but this varies depending on numerous factors.

Prices tend to stay high for a while even when the number of units sold is diminishing. List prices today are based on closed sales during the past three to six months, when prices were escalating more rapidly. It takes time for the altered situation to reflect itself in moderate prices.

A clue to our new reality is how the market is treating homes that are unattractive, in poor condition, or both. Even in the chic neighborhoods, houses with deferred maintenance that are seen as overpriced are sitting unsold. Needless to say, unappealing properties in less glamorous locations are garnering even less attention.

Up until recently, almost everything sold within two weeks of marketing. At this moment, I know of homes in good areas that continue to be for sale after more than a month.

As a seller, you need to rely on the advice of an experienced, local agent, who has gone through these cycles and can help you price realistically for the changing environment. If you listen to the market you will do well, and possibly receive multiple bids. On the other hand, if you begin with too high an asking price, you could end up with a lot less in your pocket.

If you are a buyer, you must recognize value. For any given market, attractive houses in the best locations will sell at a premium. One of the biggest mistakes you can make is to overpay for an “ugly duckling.” Uninviting properties, particularly in less-in-demand neighborhoods, are the last to sell when the market softens.

Comparing neighborhood prices

Out of curiosity, I did a study using the Multiple Listing Service (MLS). I compared median prices in the first three months of last year vs. this year for various, popular Oakland neighborhoods.

The median prices for all the locations I surveyed rose from $541,000 to $581,000, a 7.4% increase. Although most neighborhoods grew in price, a few did not. For example, Rockridge declined from $567,000 to $526,500.

Despite these figures, I know from personal experience that prices are still climbing in Rockridge. What naked numbers do not show is that a majority of the 2001 sales were from “lower” Rockridge, which dragged down the median. For the same reason, Oakmore/Upper Dimond saw only a modest gain from $569,000 to $575,000.

Neighborhoods with substantial advances were: Crocker Highlands, $604,500 to $686,500; Glenview, $332,750 to $464,000; Montclair, $564,000 to $630,840; Piedmont Avenue, $375,000 to $477,500; Redwood Heights, $410,000 to $468,000; and Upper Rockridge/Country Club, $554,000 to $740,000.

What is considered “affordable”

It is a sign of the times when the $740,000 median price in Upper Rockridge/Country Club is not considered “upper end.” Likewise, the definition of affordable has stretched into the mid-$500,000 range. Finding a two-plus bedroom home in good condition that sells for under $450,000 in any of the more fashionable areas between Oakland and El Cerrito is a mega-challenge.

This has been the catalyst for rapidly rising prices in many other neighborhoods that might not have been previously considered. In those, a good house under $400,000 tends to attract multiple offers.

Final Thoughts

If all this information sounds contradictory, that is the point. We are in the midst of a shifting landscape. Your task is not to have all the answers — even the most professional Realtors are trying to figure it out. It is to know enough to ask the right questions.

Home prices may be moving skyward, but it is unrealistic to expect this to last indefinitely. Whether you are a seller or buyer, having a grasp of neighborhood pricing is essential. This is why working with a local agent who knows the territory is so important, especially as the Bay area market moves from sizzle to simmer.

Related Articles:

Approaching the Peak
How to Buy Value

 

 

Copyright 2001 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org