Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Mold Strikes Home


By Don Dunning | May 3, 2002

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, May 3, 2002

Recently, a local couple was surprised to find one of their bathrooms infected with mold. In addition to the shiny black area on the floor, stringy looking, plant-like tentacles were growing through the wall.

They were later told these were filaments of mold called “fruiting heads” Thus began an unwanted, but interesting, learning process about mold and the seemingly innocent ways it can occur.

These homeowners had read that some molds, especially with high spore counts, can be extremely dangerous to health. They had heard of a number of Cleveland area infant deaths in the late 90s that were suspected of being mold-related. With this in mind, they immediately made an appointment with an experienced mold remediation contractor who came the same day.

The inspector took an air sample from outside, where he was parked. After looking at the mold and substantiating that the owners had been smart to act quickly, the inspector took another air sample from their bedroom, next to the moldy bathroom.

In the bathroom, he made a small hole in the sheetrock and placed a stainless steel wand, with a light on one end, into the opening. The inspector quickly evaluated the situation and declared that the mold inside the wall was worse than what could be seen outside.

He gave a ballpark bid of $2000 to remediate the mold after removing the sink, toilet and about four feet of sheetrock from the rear wall. He warned that the price could be higher if the contamination was more extensive than it initially appeared. Returning the bathroom to its original condition was extra. It was agreed that the work would begin two days later.

Next, the couple called their insurance company and made an appointment with an adjuster for the following day. They were told this must be done before the work began.

The adjuster explained that their policy covered only “sudden, accidental occurrences,” like a bursting pipe. Plumbing leaks and slow, unattended drips that cause problems, including mold, were their responsibility.

Fortunately, the homeowners had just returned from a three-week vacation. They stressed to the adjuster that there had been no mold in the bathroom before they left. He told them that, under the right conditions, mold may begin growing in as little as 12 hours. Based on this, the adjuster said they were covered, except for the deductible and plumbing repairs.

As they subsequently learned, mold coverage by insurance companies may disappear. Last month, State Farm Insurance announced they are no longer writing new California homeowners’ policies, partly because of mold claims.

Removing the mold

The following day, the inspector and two helpers erected a heavy, plastic containment around the bathroom. Once this was done, they climbed into “space suits” with thick, rubber masks, and gloves taped to their uniform.

For the next three hours, the crew removed numerous, large, sealed trash bags full of contaminated materials. They sprayed and re-sprayed the mold-infected areas with chlorine and other fungicides, and placed a huge heater/blower in the bathroom window. Then they left to let it dry.

The mold contractors came back the next day to spray again and to scrub down all the infected wood framing. Luckily, because the mold was not in place for long, the fungus did not damage the framing,

The cause of the mold infection was a broken sink valve that had allowed water to back into the wall cavity. This moisture was absorbed like a sponge by the wall insulation and sheetrock. As there was no water under the sink from this leak, it was not visible to the owners.

The mold is gone

Not surprisingly, what was supposed to be a two-day job stretched into a week. When it was over, a new air sample was taken to make sure that the spore count inside approximated the original outside sample of 2000.

About a week later, the owners received a “clearance report” in the mail. The initial sample, taken on the mold inspector’s first visit, indicated a very unhealthy spore count of 68,292. The final test, done after the mold had been removed and the bathroom reassembled, was a healthy reading of 399. Thus, after the cleanup, the indoor air in the bedroom had an even lower spore count than the ambient air sample.

Final Thoughts

Even if you do not now have mold, pay attention and periodically check for damp areas caused by plumbing, sewer line or roof leaks, or inadequate drainage.

If you think you have a serious mold problem, do not touch or disturb the mold; it could make the situation worse. When mold strikes home, act with alacrity and hire a professional to inspect.

Related Articles:

Malevolent Mold Means Misery

 

 

Copyright 2012 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org