Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Pricing by the Square Foot


By Don Dunning | June 7, 2002

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, June 7, 2002

As home prices in our area continue to hit record highs, how do you, as a buyer or seller, measure the value of one particular house in relation to others? The common method is called the “market comparison approach.” Professionals look at “comps” to evaluate how to set an asking price and to assist buyers with what to bid on a home offered for sale.

There is another method — looking at the price per square foot (ppsf) — that is very useful, but seldom discussed. Understanding the relative cost, based on the actual size of the property, could be the difference between making a wise or imprudent buying/selling decision.

Why price per sq ft is useful

Although using comps remains the best item in our pricing toolbox, studying how much buyers are paying per square foot is definitely worth the effort. I have shared this information with clients throughout my career and it has helped give them an additional perspective.

There are a number of reasons for analyzing ppsf:

  • It helps to compare properties of different sizes in the same neighborhood
  • It gives us a sense of how location effects price for homes of similar size and style
  • It gives a picture of how much people are willing to pay for “fixers” in very poor condition
  • It allows us to document pricing trends over time
Looking at the numbers

Examining prices for the most expensive new homes in prestigious and desirable locations will give you an idea of what buyers are getting for their money. At the start of 1997, there was a confluence of newly rebuilt luxury homes after the Oakland hills fire and the beginning of a still unabated seller’s market.

At that time, million dollar sales were few and far between. Today, it is a different story. At the end of 1996 and into 1997, of ten high-end new homes sold in the best Oakland areas, the highest ppsf was $278, the lowest $166 and the median $230.

In 2002, a review of 25 MLS listings of new, or almost new, houses with closed prices of a million dollars or more shows a high ppsf of $450, a low of $196 and a median of $312. Many of these are on smashing, San Francisco Bay view lots. Only three of the most expensive new properties in our market exceeded $400 ppsf.

The way I explain this to clients is that, today, the most exclusive, new homes, with all the bells and whistles, are being sold at a ppsf of slightly over $300. Taking this into consideration, we can now look at how much people are paying for older homes in good areas, but nowhere equal in either location or quality of construction.

Before 1997, it was unusual for older homes to sell as high as $300 per square foot. A quick year-to-date search of the MLS for popular, Oakland zip codes reveals buyers commonly pay in the $300s ppsf, a number in the high $400s, and some in excess of $500. This phenomenon is equally true in the Berkeley to Kensington corridor. In my opinion, alarm bells should sound when the ppsf goes over $400.

My point is not that you have made a dreadful mistake if you paid a high ppsf. You might have purchased a charmer on an exquisite lot that has been tastefully remodeled. Sometimes an older property with an abundance of character has been reborn with new systems: foundation, roof, heating, electric, plumbing, sewer line, driveway and seismic retrofitting. In this situation, assuming the home’s charisma has been kept intact and the location is highly regarded, the price can be justified.

If, on the other hand, you are considering paying a princely ppsf for a small house on a tiny lot in a good, but not great location, maybe you should think again. This is especially true if you are purchasing “As Is” and buying problems that will cost you even more after close of escrow.

Final Thoughts

What conclusions can be drawn from carefully scrutinizing the price people are paying per square foot? One could be that those buying high-end homes actually get greater value for their dollar.

Conversely, some of those in the “affordable” $450,000 to $600,000 range may be paying more than a prudent buyer would if he understood value based on ppsf. The problem is an abundance of buyers for the relatively few properties in this price range. Consequently, bidding wars push prices to stratospheric levels.

In the end, how much to ask for your home if you are selling, or the amount to offer if you are buying, is your business. Nonetheless, with so much money at stake, doesn’t it make sense to use the ppsf variable to help you make the right decision?

Related Articles:

Pricing by the Square Foot Revisited
How to Buy Value
Pricing in a Rapidly Rising Market

 

 

Copyright 2002 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org