Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions


By Don Dunning | July 26, 2004

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, July 2, 2004 and ANG Newspapers, June 26, 2004

Over the years, whether in person or via my website, East Bay Realty Pro, people repeatedly have asked me certain questions. Here are some of the more common ones. You will make a more informed buying or selling decision by understanding these basics.

Q. How are Realtors different from agents?

All Realtors are agents, but not all agents are Realtors. A Realtor is a member of the National Association of Realtors. In fact, only about one-third of all licensees in California are Realtors.

The most significant difference between Realtors and others is that Realtors must adhere to a strict code of ethics or be accountable to a Professional Standards procedure. A Realtor’s top priority is to represent your best interests. Look for someone who is local and well respected for his or her integrity and knowledge.

Even if an agent is referred by a friend or relative, be sure to have a comprehensive interview before committing.

Q. When in competition to buy a home, what is a good rule of thumb for how much to offer above the asking price?

There is no rule of thumb. How much higher is always a guessing game. Buyers and inexperienced agents base offers solely on the list price. This can often be a mistake if the property is overpriced or, conversely, underpriced.

Offering more than a grossly inflated asking price could be folly. An overpriced property, however, may sit with no offers and later be primed for a substantially lower offer with no competition. On the other hand, a home that is listed under market may warrant a bid that is well over asking, but still sensible.

Numerous other variables come into play, such as location, condition, style, floor plan, etc. A Realtor who knows the territory can guide you through the morass.

Q. With all the competition, I feel pressured to waive inspections and loan contingencies. My agent says this is the only way I will have a chance in multiple offers situations. This makes me nervous. Is it a good idea?

No, this is dangerous and the risks are rarely fully explained to buyers (or sellers reviewing bids). Contingencies protect both the buyer and seller. Despite this, aggressive salespeople encourage their buyers to make non-contingent offers.

Some buyers, sellers and agents mistakenly rely on a “pre-approval” letter as a reason to not write a financing contingency. These letters are rarely a guarantee of a loan. Regarding condition, inspections provide valuable information about actual or possible problems that allow the buyer to decide if he should continue with the transaction. Inspections are also good for sellers. In a recent meeting of the California Association of Realtors, I heard an experienced real estate attorney warn Realtors to be careful about how they represent their clients.

This attorney predicted a flood of future lawsuits by buyers against sellers and their agents when the market turns, as it eventually will. He said he is now seeing the beginning of this trend.

If history is a guide, a majority of these cases will involve failure to disclose significant problems. If a buyer has his own inspections, most issues will be uncovered. If not, and the buyer relies on the seller’s reports, this could be ammunition for lawyers. Worse still will be cases where the buyer waived his inspections and, at the same time, had few, if any, reports from the seller.

The bottom line is that contract contingencies should not be waived lightly. This trend, although common, is a bad one. Consider carefully whether an agent who recommends making an offer that leaves you vulnerable is working in your best interests.

Q. Which systems in a house should I pay most attention to during inspections?

Foundation, drainage, roof and sewer lateral are potentially the most expensive items to repair or replace. Focus on them. Homeowners sometimes make the mistake of spending large amounts on kitchen and bathroom remodels before handling foundation and/or drainage problems.

Older homes that have not had upgrades to these systems are the most likely to need work. A roof more than ten years old requires a professional inspection. Properties built in the 50s and before commonly have drainage and sewer line issues. Pay particular attention to foundations in houses constructed before 1940.

Drainage is important as, over time, water may undermine a foundation. This is not to mention possible health troubles that can be caused by excessive moisture, e.g., breathing difficulties related to mold and mildew.

Foundation and/or drainage deficiencies are normally first pointed out by a general home inspector and then further evaluated by a licensed engineer. Telltale signs of sewer lateral failure can sometimes be observed from a cracked, sunken driveway. If there are any hints of sewer line problems, make sure to hire a specialist to “camera” the line.

In their frenzy to beat the crowd, some buyers too readily accept these four systems “As Is,” without understanding how expensive and troublesome they might be. In the best case scenario, it could cost only two or three thousand dollars to repair one of them. In the worst case where several of these areas have simultaneous failures, you may pay into the serious six figures.

Final Thoughts

A Realtor’s job is to answer questions you may not even know to ask. Some have the experience, knowledge and caring to do this. Others do not. Educate yourself and choose your real estate representative carefully.

 

 

Copyright 2004 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org