Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Mixed market continues to baffle buyers, sellers


By Don Dunning | July 29, 2007

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, July 27, 2007 and ANG Newspapers, July 29, 2007

This is one of the most confusing real estate markets I have seen in my nearly 28 years in the business. If you are a buyer or seller in today’s climate of contradictions, understanding what is happening could save you money.

Looking back a year

To get a clearer picture of the Oakland residential real estate scene, I searched the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) to compare the first half of this year (January 1 to June 30) to last year for five popular zip codes.

Zip 94602
includes Glenview, Oakmore, Joaquin Miller area, and Dimond. Last year, there were 169 homes sold with a median sales price of $630,000. This year, the figures reflected 126 solds and a median sales price of $604,000.

Zip 94610
includes Crocker Highlands, Trestle Glen, Grand Lake, and China Hill. In 2006, 131 homes were sold at a median sales price of $530,000. 2007 showed 109 solds with a median sales price of $652,000.

Zip 94611
includes Montclair and the Piedmont Avenue area. 2006 figures were 182 sold homes and an $817,500 median sales price. For 2007, it was 183 solds with a $799,000 median sales price.

Zip 94618
includes the Country Club area, Rockridge, Upper Rockridge and Hiller Highlands. 2006 totals were 85 solds with a median sales price of $880,000. 138 sold in 2007 with a median sales price of $772,937.

Zip 94619
includes Ridgemont, Hillcrest Estates, Redwood Heights, and Maxwell Park. The 2006 statistics are 148 solds and a median sales price of $584,000. In 2007, there were 98 solds with a median sales price of $569,500.

When comparing the first six months of this year to last, there has been an 8.5% decrease in sold properties. It is notable that four of the five areas showed a decrease in median sales price from year to year. Only 94610 had an increase in median sales price; however, that could be due to more condos being sold in 2006.

Although still not a true “buyer’s market,” despite media hyperbole to the contrary, our market is clearly swinging in that direction.

Upper-end properties

Location is always the most important component of value. Those areas considered highly desirable, therefore, are also the most expensive and are the last to suffer in a market downturn. They also tend to be the first to recover after a prolonged period of market softness. Neighborhoods such as the Country Club area and Crocker Highlands fit into this category.

In California, as well as nationally, higher priced homes are faring much better than the lower end. I analyzed closed sales of a million dollars or more in the five zip codes for the first half of this year and last to determine whether they match this pattern.

In 2006, 116 homes sold for one million dollars or more. Of those, 60% sold over asking (70 homes). The figures for 2007 are 115 sold, with 65 (57%) selling above list price. This appears to support the theory that the wealthiest are least affected by higher interest rates, tighter lending requirements and a slowing economy. The zip with the largest number of million dollar sales was 94611, with 52 in 2006 and 53 in 2007.

Buyers, sellers in a quandary

Now, more than ever, it is imperative to know whether a particular property falls into the “likely to generate multiple offers” group. Will it be hot, or not?

Real estate reality is that the majority of houses are in the “average category.” In a seller’s market, now long gone, even these sold for a premium. Today, average homes, if priced too high, sit unsold until the price is adjusted to meet the new market. This happens with a seller or agent-induced price reduction, or by an accepted offer lower than asking.

When the market direction is consistent, lasting a year or longer, buyers, sellers and their agents tend to feel they have a grip on what is happening. Our current market does not conform to this description because some houses in top areas are still garnering multiple bids. This creates confusion.

The biggest questions for sellers now are what price to ask, what they can expect to get, and how long will it take to sell. Buyers want to know how much to offer and whether the market in the future will allow them to get a better deal. There are no simple answers.

What is next?

No one knows for sure exactly where activity and prices are going. My sense is that there is a likelihood of fewer sales and moderating prices over the next year or two. If interest rates rise significantly, the risk of a slowing market greatly increases.

Final Thoughts

During the height of our last seller’s market, some buyers bid up prices by hundreds of thousands of dollars. A number of them were able to later sell at a profit. In today’s real estate environment, overpricing or overpaying will have consequences.

Anyone can be an agent and make some sales in a fast market. Today, and in the foreseeable future, you need an experienced professional to help you make an informed decision.

Related Articles:

Hybrid Market Confuses Buyers, Sellers

 

 

Copyright 2007 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org