Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Consulting Saves Buyer’s Bacon


By Don Dunning | January 22, 2005

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, Jan. 28, 2005 and ANG Newspapers, Jan. 22, 2005

We all learn from our mistakes, but how much are you willing to pay for the lesson? Recently, a buyer was referred to me after he had an accepted contract on a local property. That phone call saved the buyer from a blunder that could have cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Consultant vs. agent

In this situation, an agent represented neither buyer nor seller. They knew each other and had negotiated and ratified a purchase agreement on their own. At that stage, my involvement as an agent was not appropriate. The buyer had questions: what was my opinion of the house, the price he was paying and the contract? This is a classic example of how consulting on an hourly basis made sense for both the buyer and me.

{Note: See “Related Articles” below for details on the contrast between an agent and a consultant.)

The house, price, contract

After the buyer signed the formal consulting agreement I had provided, we went to see the home. With an address in a very popular neighborhood, location was not a concern. The buyer explained the issues regarding the condition of this “fixer” and that he intended to quickly renovate and resell. This gave me a context in which to evaluate the purchase. The fact that it was the first home he had ever bought and that, although he was not a licensed contractor, he planned to do most of the work himself, made me uneasy.

After visiting this 1912 Traditional-style house for just a few minutes, I could plainly see it was a major fixer. Although some of the original charm remained, there were two significant problems: poor condition due to extensive deferred maintenance, and a tasteless, 1970s, contemporary addition. I explained to the buyer that the first issue was curable, at a very large expense. Unfortunately, the out-of-character addition was incurable.

Other value deflators became apparent as I looked around: numerous aluminum windows and sliding doors, incongruous in a charming, older home; an unattractive and poorly positioned exterior wooden stairway and deck; an unappealing front yard that needed a total redo; and a small lot with minimal outdoor living.

In addition, there was a tiny, contemporary master suite with a dysfunctional, badly planned bath that defied a cost effective fix. From floor to ceiling, everywhere I looked needed repair, updating or both. Within the first few hours of our meeting, and after seeing the home, I counseled the buyer to walk away from this purchase; he had offered too much. In fact, this buyer and property were simply not a good match at any price.

The contract was not professionally prepared; clauses were not clear, and neither buyer nor seller was fully protected by this document. This was something else to deal with, but only if the sale went through. As I shared my thoughts with the buyer he listened carefully, but insisted this was a project he wanted to do. The excitement of being a player in the real estate game overwhelmed his common sense and caution.

Inspections tell the story

Other than a termite report, without a dollar cost, the seller provided no other disclosures. Even though this buyer had some generalist contracting experience, he did not have enough to accurately assess the overall damage nor anticipate the worst-case scenario. I proposed he get a comprehensive inspection by a reputable home inspector.

Further, I suggested he have experts inspect, evaluate and give bids on various systems: foundation and drainage, pest control, roof, electric, heating and plumbing. Noting the long-term roof leak, I speculated about the possibility of water damage inside walls and, possibly, mold. This buyer took my advice and ordered the reports.

Once completed, the inspections painted a scary picture: 80 percent of the foundation needed replacement; the termite report was huge; there were three different types of toxic mold on each level of the house; and drainage, heating, electric and plumbing deficiencies were found. The building needed to be stripped to its studs and rebuilt with a new foundation. I felt the repairs would exceed $250,000.

Once again, I urged the buyer to forget this property. Undaunted, he decided to bargain with the seller.

Negotiating with the seller

This buyer had a number of disadvantages in getting the seller to agree to a much lower price: The house had been a rental and the seller did not have a burning need to sell now; it had not been listed and actively marketed, so the seller had an incentive to go through that process before agreeing to, what to him would be, a low price; and, other contractors had expressed interest in the home. After reviewing all his findings with the seller, the buyer was given a one-week extension on his inspection contingency. He asked for more than a 50 per cent reduction of his original offer. To me, even if the seller acquiesced, that was still too much for this particular house, but he was not ready to quit.

In the end, another contractor offered more and the seller agreed. This buyer now realizes that, at the time the seller ratified his offer, he had only a fraction of the information and knowledge he needed to make an informed choice.

Final Thoughts

Note that, as a consultant, I dealt only with the buyer and had no interactions with any third parties. This is one of the key differences between working with clients as a consultant, rather than as an agent. This distinction is not widely recognized by the public or real estate licensees.

Be aware that many agents, even those with newly printed licenses, have the word “consulting” or “consultant” on their business card. This does not signify that they know anything about consulting or the business.

If consulting seems like a good fit for you, look for an experienced, competent Realtor who does consulting on a regular basis. After all, anyone can give advice; you want good advice. Most buyers and sellers need professional assistance in today’s complicated and expensive market. Usually, this means the traditional agency relationship. Sometimes, as in this instance, hiring a real estate representative on an hourly basis is the most logical thing to do.

Related Articles:

Consultant or Agent?
Consulting Helps Couple Avoid Money Pit
Hourly consulting: Great idea whose time has yet to come
Hourly real estate consultants: Still hard to find
Berkeley seller applauds hourly real estate consulting;
 
 

Copyright 2005 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org