Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Another New Contract, Part 1


By Don Dunning | May 17, 1996

Originally appeared in Hills Publications, May 17, 1996

Earlier this year, the California Association of Realtors (CAR) again revised the purchase contract for residential properties with one to four units. Aside from changes in contract format and language, there is another important distinction from previous contract revisions. In the past, the new version of a contract replaced the older one. This time, the choice of using either the current, eight-page contract or the new, “four-page” contract is at the discretion of the agent. This has already caused some confusion among agents. If agents are confused, we can count on buyers and sellers being confused.

Many clients treat the contract as important, but not something which requires serious study. Although each revision to the purchase contract contains improvements, no contract will be perfect for everyone. A thorough review of the document will reveal which paragraphs are favorable or unfavorable to you as a seller or buyer. A comparison of the new contract and its predecessor reveals noteworthy changes. In these articles, I will highlight some points about both contracts that deserve attention.

When four equals seven

The most obvious modification is that the new contract is referred to as the “four-page” contract although it is actually seven pages long. The first two pages have a back side and there is a one-page addendum used for probate sales and other, less common, situations.

A strong word of caution: do not assume the back pages are unimportant. One could easily get that impression because the print is small, tightly packed and there is no place for the buyer or seller to sign or initial. Read everything carefully and ask questions before signing.

Cost clauses on first page

A positive change is that all cost items are now on the first page of the new four-page contract. This is convenient and sensible.

Before agreeing to pay for anything, however, be sure to ask this question: “What should I be paying for?” This really means what is “customary” in the area, but it does not necessarily mean the item or items cannot be negotiated. This is just one reason you need an experienced, knowledgeable professional to look out for your best interests.

Appraisal clause

Most agents have been adding an “Appraisal” clause into the financing section of their eight-page contracts. The new four-page contract now contains this clause.

It makes the offer contingent on the lender appraising the property at no less than the full purchase price. If the lender’s appraiser indicates a lower figure, the buyer is allowed to cancel the contract.

Another possibility is to have the seller reduce the purchase price to the appraised value. In some cases, the seller may choose to carry a second loan for the difference between the purchase price and the appraised value. Besides having both parties agree, this will only work if the buyer’s down payment is large enough, normally 20 percent or more. If the buyer’s down payment is substantially more than 20 percent of the purchase price, the less-than-full-price appraisal may not effect, i.e., decrease, the loan amount.

Possession clause

An example of the danger of not reading and understanding the back pages of the new four-page contract is the paragraph dealing with tenants and possession. This clause states that if the tenant has not vacated a tenant-occupied property at close of escrow, the buyer has the option to cancel the agreement. This language is not contained in the eight-page contract, although both contracts say the property shall be vacant at close of escrow unless otherwise agreed in writing.

From the buyer’s perspective, he will probably not want to take title to a house he plans to live in if the seller’s tenant has not vacated. If he does, he could end up in a long, drawn-out legal hassle to get the tenant out. This can be both emotionally and financially draining.

From the seller’s point of view, it may not seem fair for the buyer to cancel the contract if the tenant is late in moving out. This would be especially true if the seller fulfilled his side by giving the tenant adequate, written notice to vacate. It is apparent that buyers and sellers may have opposite interests in a rental situation. Clearly, reading and understanding the contract is imperative.

Another disparity between the four and eight-page contracts is that the four-page contract does not address the use of Interim Occupancy Agreements. This covers a situation where the buyer moves in prior to close of escrow, which is very risky for the seller. The Residential Lease Agreement After Sale, often called the seller rent back agreement, is also not mentioned. Allowing occupancy without using the appropriate form could lead to serious problems later. This could happen if an inexperienced agent was not prompted by the reminder found in the eight-page contract.

Seller warranty or no warranty?

Pay close attention to this one! Under “Condition of Property,” the eight-page contract is divided into A) “Seller Warranty” (if box is checked), or B) “As Is Condition,” (if box is checked). If, inadvertently, neither box is checked, the contract would be incomplete until one of the two options was chosen.

The four-page contract says “No Warranties Except As Specified,” and indicates that the property is sold “As Is” and “With All Faults.” It provides seven boxes where the buyer can specify which items he wants warrantied by the seller. For example, box #1 cites that “Roof shall be free of leaks known to seller or discovered during escrow.” Other boxes cover appliances, plumbing, fireplaces, etc.

The danger for a buyer is that his agent could inadvertently forget to check any boxes in this section. The purchase would then be an “As Is” sale. “As Is,” of course, benefits the seller, but is it what the buyer is intending at the price he is offering? This illustrates the reason for my belief that having two contracts available with different formats could cause confusion to clients.

To this point, I have covered some of the aspects of purchase contracts that require your diligence. In Another New Contract, Part Two, I will describe other possible pitfalls for both buyers and sellers.

Related Articles:

Another New Contract, Part 2
Contract Revised Again
Understand Before You Sign
Not Just Termites, Part 1
Not Just Termites, Part 2
 
 

Copyright 1996 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985) Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without modification and that proper attribution is given. These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org