Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Condo financials deserve special attention


By Don Dunning | April 6, 2014

Originally appeared in Bay Area News Group publications on April 4, 2014

“You must trust yourself more than you trust others.”
– Suze Orman

If you plan to buy a condo, you are choosing to become partners with from one to hundreds of strangers in a shared financial arrangement. The others are the current condo owners in the building. Additional strangers (new buyers) will later join the group.

You will be participating in a written agreement to share the costs of maintaining and/or upgrading the building and its common areas. In the right building, with the right co-owners, this can work beautifully. If, however, you buy in a problem building with uncooperative or unrealistic owners, your condo ownership experience could be truly troubling.

I recently wrote an article about hidden problems in condo buildings and received a number of reader emails substantiating my warnings.

HOA dues

Some potential buyers mistakenly cheer when they see low HOA dues for a particular unit. As these dues are intended for maintenance and reserves, inadequate monthly fees are a clue to the likelihood of a building with management problems. If there are management issues, sooner or later, there will be deficiencies in the building itself.

Reserves

Healthy reserves are the fulfillment of proper planning and a reflection of a well-run condo association. Human nature is the biggest stumbling block to this process. Given a choice of charging themselves more each month to protect the future of the building or paying less and rolling the dice, too many condo associations choose the latter.

Insufficient reserve funding is part of a vicious cycle. Over time, the HOA realizes there are not enough dollars to adequately handle problems that inevitably arise in buildings. This leads to a sort of “triage effect,” where situations are ranked in priority order.

What sounds like a rational path is actually the beginning of a dangerous downward slide where problems are tackled mainly on a cost basis. The worst problem is repaired, but in the least expensive way, which means it will, possibly, resurface again. Problem number two is handled similarly, if at all.

Other items that need attention now are put off until added funds are available. It does not take long before the building is more a list of serious deferred maintenance than a good investment and pleasant place to live.

At some point, owners have the unenviable choice of a huge dues increase and/or a sizeable special assessment. They grumble and wonder how this could have happened. Meanwhile, how much responsibility did each owner take to be truly informed about the relationship between reserves and building care?

A reader of my last condo article commented about the nondisclosure of “chronic underfunding of the reserve account.” He said, “Everyone focuses on the monthly HOA dues, but ignores the recommendations in the legally required ‘reserve study.’ Many larger, older condo buildings think they are fine if they have a few hundred thousand dollars in their reserve fund, when they should have a couple million. A small dues increase, multiplied by many years, would correct this problem, but who elects not to buy a condo because the dues have been too low to properly fund the reserve account?”

The HOA

Homeowner’s Associations are composed of unit owners who volunteer their time and effort to help govern the building. Once again, human nature reveals that too many will allow others to do for them what they should also be doing, i.e., participating on the HOA board of directors.

Over time, competent, long-time HOA directors get tired of this unpaid, high-stress part-time job and quit. Positions now open to those who may be less competent, less caring or less committed. Although this scenario is not always the case, it is not unexpected. This observation was supported by another reader with HOA governing experience.

One more reader wrote that she was told, about the HOA, when she bought some years ago, “the finances were in great shape and it was well run. The board president undertook a massive dry rot repair a couple years later, with no experience in managing massive projects. It went way over budget and caused assessments and huge upset in the association. The management company was useless in sorting it all out. Dues were so high at one point no condos would sell. With much hard work, things are a bit better now.”

Her email continued, “People think the HOA will handle everything and your life will be carefree. Nothing could be farther from the truth as owners have to spend much time and frustration dealing with the financial and other issues in an HOA. High management fees and still owners must work hard at all the issues”

She went on to say, “I recently attended our annual meeting and a graph showed [almost half] of expenses are for management company, insurance and bureaucracy. [About forty percent] on property maintenance! So more spent on the tremendous amount of bureaucracy created than on property maintenance.” This reader ended with, “If the economy in the SF Bay Area was not so good, I feel our HOA would be in real trouble.”

Final thoughts

Condos are a wonderful choice for some people and they buy for different reasons. In certain cases, it is the most affordable first-time buyer option. For others, it is a step toward simplification and less time spent on home and garden maintenance. Regardless, there is a vast difference between owning a single-family residence and a condo.

As one of my readers opined, “This is a subject people do not discuss when buying near enough!” Do your homework and know what you are buying beforehand or risk suffering the consequences.

Related Articles:

Condo Buildings May Hide Serious Secrets

 

 

Copyright 2014 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org