Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Trials and tribulations of a real estate expert witness


By Don Dunning | September 21, 2012

Originally appeared in Bay Area News Group publications on September 21, 2012

Being a Bay Area real estate expert witness can sometimes be fun, like the time I testified in court with a giant blow-up of one of my newspaper articles in front of the jury. Mostly, however, it is a stressful assignment that only a handful of real estate licensees choose to experience.

As an expert witness, I volunteer to be verbally accosted by opposing attorneys. In their zealous attempt to discredit my opinions and testimony, many lawyers on the other side of my cases seem to want to chew and spit out my larynx.

Aside from the jousting at depositions, arbitrations and court, other issues add to the difficulties of doing expert witness work.

Not retained early enough

I belong to two networks of expert witness professionals. One of the biggest complaints from those who work in disciplines that range from accident reconstruction to trade secret theft and hand writing analysis to hidden or deleted computer files, is that many attorneys hire and designate their experts very late in the legal process. This is a reflection of busy lawyers juggling perhaps too many cases, but is also a function of limited budgets. Although hiring experts late in a case appears to save the plaintiff or defendant client money, it often costs them more in the end.

When retained earlier in a dispute, the expert has adequate time to review relevant materials and let the attorney know his or her opinion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case. This information can assist counsel in possibly modifying his or her “theory” of the case and how best to proceed.

When experts are called in at the 11th hour, especially at the point where depositions have already been completed, attorneys lose what could have been valuable input from the expert. Although this may not change the expert’s opinions, important opportunities to strengthen the case are frequently missed and this is a cause of great frustration to me and other expert witnesses.

As an example, I read a deposition in a recent case where key questions were not asked of one
of the agents because the deposing attorney did not understand the real estate business. This is common with attorneys who are generalists.

Missing documents

It is the job of the attorney who hires me to provide all the necessary documents so I can establish an opinion on my part of the case. Regrettably, some lawyers have to be constantly pushed and prodded to produce paperwork that I should review.

Usually, attorneys who function in this unprofessional way are also dropping the ball in other areas and are not doing the best possible job for their clients. I avoid working with them again.

Poor attorney communication and follow-up
The best lawyers keep me informed about the case and dates when I might be needed. Others are hard to track down and are not speedy about returning phone calls and emails.

As his expert, I need to be clear on the attorney’s view of the case. Understandably, attorneys prefer that their experts read the documents and reach an opinion without undue influence. Nonetheless, it is the lawyer’s job to communicate his approach to the case with me once I have agreed to work with him. Often, I have to ask because he did not volunteer his theory.

If my opinion does not support his case, it is best for him to hire another expert. Unfortunately, when the expert is hired and designated to the court at the last minute, it may not be possible to switch experts.

I used to love you, but it’s all over now.

Many attorneys I meet are good human beings, both before and after a case is complete. Conversely, others remind me of the Rolling Stones song. Once the case is concluded, they are slow responding to phone calls and emails and even slower in issuing checks for my services.

That, as they say, is life in the fast lane, but it is interesting how some apparently friendly, likable attorneys become cold strangers when they no longer need us. This is obviously not a smart business practice because experts who are treated that way will not work with those lawyers again. And, the word does get around.

Final Thoughts

With all these drawbacks, from possible missing body parts to constant stress from attorneys, why would anyone want to be an expert witness? One big reason for me is that I learn something new each time I go through the process and this information is helpful in my real estate sales practice. Another is that a legal case is like a sports competition, and I find that challenging.

As a Realtor and Northern California real estate expert witness, one fact is always predominant in my mind – an agent’s job is to work in the client’s best interests. Those who consistently do that rarely end up in legal disputes.

Related Articles:

From the Eyes of an Expert Witness

 

 

Copyright 2012 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Tags: Expert Witness, Newspaper article, Real Estate Law

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org