Real Estate Articles & Blog - Don Dunning
Menu
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don
  • Home
  • East Bay Realty Pro
  • Expert Witness
  • Hourly Consulting
  • About Don
  • Contact Don

Oakland market snapshot: January thru September 2010


By Don Dunning | October 16, 2010

Originally appeared in Bay Area News Group publications on October 15, 2010

This is the third, seriously down market in my more than 30 years in real estate and I notice buyers and sellers repeating some of the same mistakes. These include buyers paying well over asking on properties that do not appear to justify the high price and sellers listing too high for the market.

To get a clearer picture of the situation in Oakland, I researched a specific subset of properties. The results confirmed my observations.

My search

Given an enormous amount of data to choose from, I looked at single-family, detached houses that sold in the popular zip code 94602, from January through September, selling price $500,000 to $1,000,000. Although different neighborhoods will likely reflect somewhat varying results, the price range represents a healthier part of the market, with fewer distressed sales, than those below this level.

All data came from the Multiple Listing Service (MLS). A total of 89 properties were in this category. For comparison, the same search parameters showed 194 sold in 2004 and 191 in 2005, so, clearly, the market is now in a soft spot.

Listing price and days on market

Pricing is always critically important, but even more so in a buyer’s market. Of the total solds, slightly more than half (45), closed at a price equal to or higher than asking. The average days on MLS (defined as the number of days from entry to an accepted offer) was 15, excellent for today’s market.

Not counting distressed sales (REOs and short sales), 30 properties sold for less than list price. Their average days on MLS was 44. Those unfamiliar with our local market may consider this outstanding, especially in comparison to many other parts of our country. From my experience, however, generally speaking, the longer a home is for sale beyond two weeks, the less favorable a financial outcome for the seller.

The implication here is that this group of houses was overpriced for what they were, where they were and for their condition. Although many sellers have trouble accepting this, sharp pricing results in a faster sale and the highest possible price, sometimes with multiple offers, even in this buyer’s market.

Sellers who lost money

Without including short sales and REOs, there were 11 homes, 12 per cent of the total, where the purchase price was less than what the seller paid (in most cases, purchased 2003 to 2005). The amount of loss ranged from a low of $10,000 to a high of $199,000, not counting the cost of buying and selling. The latter costs usually total two to three per cent of the purchase price for buying, and six to seven per cent for selling. These figures can significantly change an expected positive outcome to a negative.

The risk of buying high

In every type of market, I always warn my buyers about the risk of overpaying, especially in competition. This is most dangerous in a buyer’s market.

During seller’s markets, I have seen how emotion and the fear of being priced out creates a frenzied atmosphere where many buyers focus on “winning” a house regardless of price because there is the expectation that its value will increase. In reality, every market changes at some point, but, too often, agents do not remind their buyers of that.

With a substantial number of sellers walking away with fewer dollars than they have in the property, it is hard to justify paying as much, or more, today than a particular home sold for during the 2003-2005 peak. Despite that, I noticed some of the sales under discussion here that equaled or exceeded the hot market numbers. Although few things still surprise me in the business, this stunned me.

Most of us need to be circumspect about such a large purchase. To me, it is mind-boggling to pay more than necessary when there are many desirable, attractively priced properties now for sale.

Final Thoughts

If you are, or are thinking about being, a seller, this is not an easy time. No one knows how long it might be before the market returns to normal, no less turns to a seller’s advantage again. I see nothing on the horizon to make me think this will be any time soon.

As a seller who can’t wait for a market swing, make sure your agent is totally familiar with your neighborhood and provides you with recent, comparable sales to help you set a realistic price that is appealing to buyers. If you do so, you stand the best chance of selling at the highest price the market will bear.

On the other hand, if you are a buyer, this is a wonderful opportunity. Flexible prices and record low interest rates are to your advantage. Work with an agent who cares more about your best interests than in making a quick sale. You also need to be familiar with comparables in your purchase area. Remember that these reveal little about condition, a major factor in pricing. Professional agents know how to get this information for you.

Whether you are a seller or buyer, understanding the dynamics and reality of our current market can make or save you a lot of money.

 

 

Copyright 2010 Don Dunning (Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985)
Permission is given to freely copy any or all articles for personal and
noncommercial use provided they are copied in full without
modification and that proper attribution is given.
These articles may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, nor linked to from another site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories


  • Adding Value – Gardening/Landscaping/Renovations (29)
  • Alameda (2)
  • Around the House (20)
  • Carmel (1)
  • Community (43)
  • Condos (2)
  • Environment (27)
  • Events (13)
  • Expert Witness (7)
  • General Information (23)
  • Going Green (14)
  • History (13)
  • Home Maintenance (15)
  • Homeless (1)
  • Homes for Sale (8)
  • Hourly Consulting (10)
  • Local Attractions (24)
  • Mortgages-Loans (9)
  • New Orleans (1)
  • Oakland Neighborhoods (27)
  • Oh, Please (7)
  • Parks (1)
  • Pets (4)
  • Real Estate (285)
  • Real Estate Advice (109)
  • Real Estate in the News (77)
  • Real Estate Newspaper Articles (164)
  • Restaurants (3)
  • Rockridge (1)
  • Shops (6)
  • Technology (1)
  • The Economy (48)
  • Travel (3)

Tags


Buying Buying a home California unemployment Choosing an agent City Ordinance Cohousing Communal Housing construction data mining Dimond East Bay Events Expert Witness gardening green living Historical Sites home inspections Home Loans home maintenance lead paint legislation Mortgages multiple offers Newspaper article Oakland Oaktoberfest Oktoberfest Online real estate organic Pets Points of Interest Real Estate Advice Real Estate Law real estate news renovation Rockridge schools Selling a Home shopping social networking Tax Credit Technology termites The Economy Travel

Archives


  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • September 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • June 2002
  • May 2002
  • April 2002
  • January 2002
  • November 2001
  • October 2001
  • September 2001
  • August 2001
  • July 2001
  • June 2001
  • May 2001
  • April 2001
  • February 2001
  • January 2001
  • November 2000
  • October 2000
  • September 2000
  • August 2000
  • July 2000
  • June 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • February 2000
  • January 2000
  • November 1999
  • August 1999
  • July 1999
  • May 1999
  • April 1999
  • March 1999
  • January 1999
  • October 1998
  • September 1998
  • July 1998
  • June 1998
  • February 1998
  • November 1997
  • October 1996
  • May 1996
  • August 1995
  • July 1995

Copyright © 2018 Don Dunning - Bureau of Real Estate Lic. #00768985

Theme created by PWT. Powered by WordPress.org