Whenever the residential market heats up, buyers start being creative.
In this, they are often prompted by their agents. An agent’s creativity
can be a great asset; however, the advisability of some techniques is open
to question.
You are a serious, qualified buyer who has been in the market to buy
a home for what seems like forever. Every Sunday you go to open houses
and see hordes of other, well qualified buyers who are interested in the
same types of homes.
It has even reached the point where you recognize and chat with some
of the familiar faces, commiserating on the insanity of the current market.
You may have made one or more offers and been beaten out in a multiple
offer presentation for a home you liked.
On Thursday, as soon as it came on the market, your Realtor called
and showed you the house. Attracted to it, you tell him you want to write
a contract, but when should you do it? The seller will not look at offers
until the following Tuesday.
If you write immediately, won’t your offer be too low if other buyers
join the fray? Probably. Trying to be logical, you decide to wait until
right before the presentation of the offers to write yours. By then you
should know how many other buyers you are competing against, right?
Unfortunately, there is still a problem. The listing (seller’s) agent
has told your agent that one or two additional offers may still be coming.
She will not know until the last minute if these contracts will materialize.
What to do?
Disappointed and frustrated, you have decided not to lose again.
You ask your Realtor how you can gain an edge. He tells you that “everyone”
is writing offers with one or more front pages when they are in multiple
offer situations.
The first page contains the information on purchase price and financing
and can easily be substituted with another you have already signed. You
simply sign a “best case”, i.e., lowest price, front page and another with
a higher offer. Some agents even have their buyers sign more than two first
pages. They submit the one they feel is appropriate based on how many others
are actually in competition.
What ensues may not be exactly what you anticipated. In one scenario,
the Realtor tells the seller and listing agent he has more than one offer,
while pulling out the highest one. I know of a number of cases where the
seller was uncomfortable with this procedure, even though it might have
helped him get a higher price.
On the other hand, what if the buyer’s agent doesn’t tell the seller
about the existence of more than one front page and the highest one is
not presented? Is this fair and honest dealing? Wouldn’t most sellers
feel they were entitled to the best offer? What about the other buyers
who played by the rules and gave it their best shot?
If he finds out, the seller may wonder how much discretion the buyer’s
agent has and what specific directions, if any, the buyer gave him. Were
they given verbally, or does he have specific, detailed written instructions
signed and dated by the buyer?
The difference between these two positions is important. Very few agents
get written instructions from their buyer. This puts the buyer’s agent
in a possibly vulnerable position with both the buyer and seller. Although
common in certain areas, this approach can cause majors upsets. Even if
handled in writing by the buyer, it could be considered a violation of
the Realtor code of ethics.
Something to keep in mind: the question of trust arises in such a situation
and a seller may be suspicious about how many other items within the contract
are not what they seem. He may opt for another buyer’s offer because he
feels more secure with a straightforward approach. I have seen this happen.
The script is the same as above. You are a buyer in competition and
are determined to win. A friend tells you about this other technique: just
offer higher than the highest bid. You can’t lose, right? It depends.
You attach a letter to your contract stating you will pay $1000 more
than the highest offer, not to exceed a specific price. This is called
a relative offer. The amount you agree to is related to the highest offer
from any other buyer.
To protect yourself, you ask for a copy of the contract of the highest
bidder. If you don’t get it, how will you be sure what the highest offer
was? If, however, you do get the contract, the seller and his agent will
be breaching the confidentiality of that buyer’s offer.
What would happen if every buyer did this? One says $1000 more than
the highest offer; others say $3000 more, $7000 more and so on? There would
not be any actual offers, would there? A relative offer is another case
where buyers playing by one set of rules would be unfairly taken advantage
of by those operating under different guidelines.
In a recent newspaper article, an experienced Bay Area real estate attorney
recommended that sellers not accept relative bids and that buyers not make
them. He indicated that these offers may not be valid, which makes them
risky.
Beyond that, it makes sense for a seller to give equal dignity to all
offers and have all buyers on a level playing field.
A number of buyers who win in an auction atmosphere now may find themselves
having to sell during a market downturn. They will find that today’s reality
is just temporary.
Learn from the past. Thousands of buyers in this area who bought at
the height of the last real estate bull market had negative equity not
long after. They lost a lot of money when they sold. Instead of receiving
a check, they had to write one to close the escrow.
Make sure you are not caught in this trap. Do your homework. Understand
neighborhoods and values before entering a bidding war.
Ask yourself if it is worth it to win at all costs. Ponder the importance
of ethics and how much you can trust an agent who bends the rules, even
if it is ostensibly on your behalf. Integrity is one thing that should
never be for sale.
Hot
Market Tips: Buyers and Hot Market
Tips: Sellers.
Emotional Ping-Pong, Mutiple
Offers, Part 1 and Part 2,
Going the Extra Mile.
|